Skip to main content
Loading…
This section is included in your selections.

The Hearing Examiner and City Council shall review the requested vacation, provided the applicant can demonstrate that:

(1) Granting the vacation will not conflict with the general purposes and objectives of the City’s comprehensive plan regarding land use, streets, utilities, drainage, parks, trails, and open space;

(2) The street, or portion thereof, is not likely to serve a useful public purpose both now and in the future, which cannot be met through use of easements for a specific purpose, or the vacation will best serve the public interest;

(3) The vacated area will not increase the number of single-family building sites or multifamily density. This may be mitigated by appropriate conditions on the vacated area; and

(4) The request for vacation was not initiated to correct a condition created by an applicant in violation of City ordinance. (Ord. 06-12 § 1 (Exh. 1))